GOD ONLINE: Exploring media spirituality

Web sites, TV, films, books and the search for meaning.

DVD review: ‘Pink Smoke Over the Vatican’

with 2 comments

Nearly 100 women have been ordained as priests or bishops in recent years, and been condemned by the Roman Catholic Church. Their actions, feelings and spiritual urgings make absorbing material in Pink Smoke Over the Vatican.

Unfortunately, the documentary has a lot of other stuff: biased reporting, strident rhetoric, manipulative lighting, and repetition of arguments that make it feel way longer than its 58 minutes.

Patricia Fresen of South Africa ordains another woman in "Pink Smoke Over the Vatican."

The title is drawn from an incident on April 17, 2005, when protestors released pink smoke in front of several U.S. cathedrals. The act was timed to the conclave that elected Pope Benedict XVI, who soon informed the world he would hold the line on male-only ordination.

“The Church is an unapologetic boys club and deeply hostile to women’s agency, power and voice,” says author Angela Bonavoglia.

The documentary is actually more current than when it came out several months ago. On March 31, the Religion News Service reported that the Rev. Roy Bourgeois, one of those quoted in the film, is under threat of defrockment for helping ordain Janice Sevre’-Duszynska. He said he’s seeking a church lawyer and plans to fight the order.

Pink Smoke takes pains to show advocates’ intellectual creds: As Kathleen Kunster speaks, a subtitle shows her M.Div., M.A. and Psy.D. degrees. They are earnest, articulate, engaging as they tell their stories and explain their beliefs.

“My faith is in my DNA,” another says.

“I felt cellularly rearranged,” one says about the instant of her ordination.

“I knew that there was a place for women on the altar more than just in a coffin or as a bride,” Sevre’-Duszynska says.

Victoria Rue of San Jose, Calif., crosses herself not in the name of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit, but “our Creator, our brother Jesus and wisdom, Sophia.” As part of a homegrown Mass, she uses tai chi-like movements as a bodily way of worshiping.

Patricia Fresen gushes about feeling a “flame of hope and longing and incredible excitement” to hear of the ordination of seven women in 2002 on a ship on the Danube River in Europe. She herself was then ordained by two of them.

But this film doesn’t stop at reporting; it takes the feminists’ side. Only one talking head on the other side is allowed — bald, elderly Father Ronald Lengwin, a spokesman for the Diocese of Pittsburgh — sitting at his desk, backed by coldly blue-lit walls. When feminists answer, they’re shot at gardens and seashores and sunlit churches.

Lengwin says church law is not about sexism but “an understanding of one’s part in the church, male and female.” He also appeals to tradition going back to when Jesus picked 12 males as apostles.

In rebuttal, the advocates note that the Church once supported slavery, condemned money lending and allowed priests to marry.

They also cite a Bible verse that honors a woman named Junia as an apostle. And they show early frescos of women in vestments apparently saying Mass.

Pink Smoke stumbles in examining Bible verses, though. It approvingly cites Paul saying that all differences — including those of gender — are erased, “for you are all one in Christ Jesus.” But it disapprovingly cites Paul’s verse not allowing a woman “to teach or exercise authority over a man.” Why is one valid and not the other, besides the fact that it agrees with the advocates?

It also goes too far as its subjects try to link women’s ordination with their own favorite causes. Several invoke civil rights leaders like Harriet Tubman, Sojourner Truth and, of course, Martin Luther King Jr.

Bourgeois and Sevre’-Duszynska complain about the U.S. military, reflecting their focus on peace activism. Fresen tells how she defied apartheid in South Africa by opening her school to all races.

Joanna Manning of Toronto, who has treated AIDS-infected babies in Africa, somehow links condoms with women’s ordination. And several advocates push for ending the celibacy requirement for priests.

But they stumble again by claiming that if priests could marry, sexual abuse cases cases would dwindle. Pedophilia, the form of abuse most priests are accused of, has little to do with marriage: Thousands of married men abuse their own biological children.

Besides, what does all that have to do with women’s ordination? You know, the issue this film is supposed to be about?

For all its arguments, Pink Smoke actually misses a few points. It could have pointed out that Jesus picked all Jews as apostles, yet the Church feels free to ordain non-Jewish priests.

In fact, the Roman Catholic Church itself has honored three women — Catherine of Siena, Teresa of Avila and Terese of Lisieux — as “doctors of the Church,” whose writings are valid sources of Catholic teaching. If they can be thinkers, why not be pastors?

Finally, a poll in May 2010 by CBS and The New York Times found that 59 percent of American Catholics favor ordaining women. So the hierarchy’s position isn’t well-received in the pews.

As a chronicle of why some women feel driven to a ministry that the Church reserves for men, Pink Smoke is a textured, sensitive success. As a thoughtful, many-sided analysis of reasons for and against ordaining women, the documentary fails.

Whatever you think about women’s ordination, it’s bad form to tell you what to think. Isn’t that one of the things the advocates fault the Church for doing?

For more information on the documentary, visit pinksmokeoverthevatican.com.


Written by Jim Davis

April 4, 2011 at 3:05 am

2 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. This “review” doesn’t mention the author’s name. Sounds like a man, making the same kind of judgmental remarks he criticizes the film for. The film was not meant to be a many-sided analysis, but the story of the women who want to be ordained. The women weren’t telling viewers what to think, but sharing their own thinking, which is everyone’s right, and the purpose of the documentary.



    April 4, 2012 at 7:19 pm

    • Thanks for taking the time to write your comments, Penny. I wrote this review before I started signing my name. And yes, I’m a man, although I find it odd for you to make an issue of that, as if someone of the opposite gender would necessarily see “Pink Smoke” differently. If I were in fact reacting as a stereotypical male, would I have included reasons in favor ordaining women — reasons that weren’t brought up in the documentary?

      Of course the women in “Pink Smoke” have the right to their opinions about the Catholic Church, as I have to my opinions about the documentary. But “Pink Smoke” didn’t merely tell their story; it attempted to give a bit to the other side, in putting an anti-ordination priest on camera. As I said in the review, though, the weight of arguments — and the very way he and his opponents were filmed — heavily favored the ordination side. It would have been better to stick to the women’s stories totally, than to present such an unbalanced treatment.

      I was also puzzled when you said my review was itself biased. Well, gee, bias is what reviews are all about. They don’t merely describe; they comment and judge and evaluate. Producers understand this, which is why they send review copies to people like me.

      The only other thing I can recommend is that you get the DVD and see it for yourself. Then you can add another comment here or write your own review.

      Thanks again for writing.

      — Jim Davis



      April 5, 2012 at 3:11 am

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: